Tuomas Malinen on Geopolitics and the Economy

Share this post

User's avatar
Tuomas Malinen on Geopolitics and the Economy
Thoughts on Nuclear Deterrence
Wars

Thoughts on Nuclear Deterrence

The strategic aftermath of the Oreshnik

Tuomas Malinen's avatar
Tuomas Malinen
Dec 11, 2024
∙ Paid
9

Share this post

User's avatar
Tuomas Malinen on Geopolitics and the Economy
Thoughts on Nuclear Deterrence
Share

I am still leaning towards the hypothesis that the NATO/Ukraine strikes to Toropets in early morning of September 18 included a tactical (low-yield, low-radiation) nuclear weapon. Since the piece I published on the topic, I have continued to discuss on the hypothesis with people familiar with explosions, and they continue to convey the same message: it’s extremely difficult to make warehouse of conventional explosives to go in a way that forms a massive mushroom cloud, unless they have been piled up for such a purpose. Thus, no one has been able to refute the hypothesis of a (tactical) nuclear strike, while circumstantial evidence continues to point to that direction.

What adds to this is the “Oreshnik” strike by Russia on the factory in Dnipro. The “test-launch” of the missile has permanently changed the nuclear deterrence with some dire implications. First figures on the devastation at the Yuzhmash plant have also appeared. I will detail also those.

Utter devastation

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Tuomas Malinen on Geopolitics and the Economy to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Tuomas Malinen
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share