Craziness Deepens

The last move of the Deep State before (temporarily) relinquishing power? (Free)

Update. Just after I published this, I learnt that the AFU had struck Russia with British Storm Shadow missiles. This, unfortunately, seems to corroborate my conclusion.

So, like I’ve been warning for some time, the “parting gift” of President Biden was opening a route to WWIII by allowing the usage of U.S. provided weapons to strike Russia. These crazies, i.e., the military industrial complex and the (possible) ‘group-over-groups’ really do want their war.

Yet, we are not lost, while their aim can be cunningly sinister.

The Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU), expectedly, struck Russia with ATACMS (Army Tactical Missile System) almost immediately after the permission was given. U.S. officials state that eight missiles were fired and two were intercepted. Russia says six were fired, while they shot down five, and that “debris” fell into an unspecified military facility sparking fire. Sounds a lot like the Toropets incident, doesn’t it? We of course do not know what happened, expect that, most likely, missiles were fired.

According to preliminary reports, the ATACMS fired by the AFU hit the site of 65th GRAU (Main Missile and Artillery Directorate of Russian MoD), which held mostly old Soviet-era arsenal, irrelevant to the campaign in Ukraine. The strike thus seems to be another ‘smoke an mirrors’. Russia on the other hand has reportedly continued its air-raid campaign to cripple Ukraine, while recent strikes seem to be aimed at installations of the AFU.

There’s a rumor that Kremlin would have reached out to President Zelenskyy, through Turkey, with one message. Ukraine has an option: it can either continue striking Russia with U.S. delivered (and aimed) weapons and spend the winter in darkness and cold, or it can not. If this holds, it would be a move of a seasoned political “fox”, President Putin, to avoid nuclear war. Moreover, Russian television is not preparing the general populace to nuclear strikes. We, most likely, dodged a bullet, again.

Yet, a more sinister (worst-case) scenario exists.

I’ve been pondering, what would be the aim of military-industrial complex (Deep State) and the ‘group-over-groups’ (GoG) in this changed setup, i.e., after Trump victory? I am thinking that I provided a possible answer in my article, Strategical asymmetry in a game theoretical model of a tactical nuclear first strike. I am revising it, because the published article was nothing more than a rudimentary analysis, but it provides some important insights, like this:

The risk is that any usage of tactical nuclear weapons would permanently change the world. While MAD (mutually assured destruction) would likely to be avoided after the tactical first strike, wars would be likely to become inherently more destructive and the threshold for an all-out nuclear war would become permanently lowered. This quite straight-forwardly implies that the first (battlefield) use of tactical nuclear weapons would greatly increase the likelihood of MAD, in the longer run.

I am thinking that this is the ‘can of worms’ they want to open. After the first use of tactical nuclear weapon is confirmed, we enter an era of nuclear warfare. My article essentially showed that in a similar setup than in Ukraine (a proxy-war between nuclear powers), the cycle of escalation will stop after the (tactical) nuclear first strike. This for the simple reason that a (rational) nuclear power does not want to enact MAD after a (tactical) nuclear strike to her ally. It simply is not worth it. In the update, I have already discovered other “equilibria” in a nuclear confrontation. I hope I have the time to finish the update some time early next year.

So, the current endgame in Ukraine, for the Deep State, could be that they enact the era of nuclear warfare, a ‘nuclear family’ of the world, before they are forced to relinquish power. This would be done to permanently alter the warfare, and essentially to allow more destructive wars in the future, while avoiding MAD (at the beginning at least). Why they would seek for this, arises from the (assumed) logic of the GoG:

If one applies Occam’s razor to everything described above, it yields one clear answer. There must be a very powerful group above parliaments, national elites and supranational organizations, like the World Economic Forum and the Bilberberg Group, pushing its own agenda of Divide et Impera. Moreover, the agenda must be exceptionally brutal, as it seems to attack all levels of human existence (physical, mental, emotional, spiritual). The existence of such a group would fit in with what President Wilson described in the early 20th century.

Based on this logic, the aim of such a group-over-groups is likely to be to subjugate the whole of human existence under some kind of global control. They seem to want people mentally disturbed, weak, undernourished and fearful. This makes sense, because such people are easy to control and push in different directions, like hating the un-vaxed, Russians or Palestinians.

This again, is extremely speculative, but I don’t think we can bypass this possibility anymore. Opening up a nuclear warfare would unleash fear like no other military action. A world war fought with nuclear weapons would also bring famine and a collapse of global population, which has been speculated to be one of the aims of the ‘globalists’. The aim may thus be to set the world up for a future catastrophe by introducing nuclear weapons into battlefield use.

If this is the aim, we would see another leg of escalation, as the current effort failed to deliver the desired outcome (Russian nuclear strikes). Like I’ve been detailing, such moves would be likely to include either strikes to Moscow (etc.) or, as a batshit crazy last-resort option, a false flag attack to Ukraine or Europe, by NATO. However, I am keen to think that the coming administration of President Trump is already ‘tightening the noose‘ around the Biden administration and the Deep State. That’s why I am hopeful that we fail to see the Peak Escalation, in Ukraine.

Developments on the ground, in Ukraine, in the coming weeks will show, whether we are in the entrance to this Rabbit hole, or not. Let’s hope for the best.

---

Disclaimer:

The information contained herein is current as at the date of this entry.  The information presented here is considered reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed.  Changes may occur in the circumstances after the date of this entry and the information contained in this post may not hold true in the future.

No information contained in this entry should be construed as investment advice.  Readers should always consult their own personal financial or investment advisor before making any investment decision, and readers using this post do so solely at their own risk. 

Readers must make an independent assessment of the risks involved and of the legal, tax, business, financial or other consequences of their actions. GnS Economics nor Tuomas Malinen cannot be held i) responsible for any decision taken, act or omission; or ii) liable for damages caused by such measures.